post postmodernism?

After being steeped for a few days in the postmodern thinking of The Heirs of Columbus, it feels easy to assume that postmodernism is the ultimate stage in literary theory so far.  In this class, though, we have seen how theories build on each other and are modified or sometimes even rejected over time.  So, what is the next step from postmodernism?  Assuming a Hegelian dialectic (which perhaps we cannot do… but still, it seems useful in describing some aspects of history), will there be a backlash from postmodern ideals?  Even if we maintain some elements of postmodern thought forever, where will changes need to take place?

From my perspective, it seems that the main problem with the postmodern mindset is its lack of direction.  If thought accumulates like an ever-expanding rhizome, what is the purpose of adding to that rhizome?  Why do we continue to pile on spore after spore, adding to the heap like literary hoarders? What is the goal of creativity, especially when we recognize that no temporary plateau of ideas will last?

Perhaps the goal is to promote ongoing communication between people.  Even if, as a whole, we do not move towards anything in particular, the process of creating and dialoguing together keeps us in conversation with each other, in relationship.  In finding things we share and noticing places where we differ, we have opportunities to interact with each other and pursue meaningful relationship.  That is a worthwhile process.  But I’m curious to see what new directions the future holds too.